Tagged with Christoffer Boe

OVERHEARD AT TÓXICO: CHRISTOFFER BOE

On conventions, familiarity, strangeness and limbs

“Completely conventional movie making doesn’t make sense to me. Why would anyone want to do a film that someone else could have done? Unless you want a commercial film. An art-house film wants to say: I am a little different from what you’ve seen. And I will not bore you, trust me. Art-house movies should experiment more. We have less expectations to contend with. So make something interesting and personal. How can we cut a scene to contain different emotions? How can we twist a theme, make it both familiar and strange? But the more stylized or quirky your movie, the more natural the acting has to be. There has to be something to connect with, an anchor that you can relate to and that drags you into a strange world. Because if there is a certain point of departure that seems understandable, then the movie can twist and turn you, from this gravitational point onwards and take you out on a limb. But you need something to lure people to the limb first. Actors are one of the strongest anchors in movies. So they have to be very real. I am only conventional in the picking of my actors. I only choose the very best; it is that simple. I have used some of the best European actors in my films.”

***

(Boe gave a fabulous Tóxico Workshop in 2008. We were supposed meet again, a month ago, in Copenhagen. But, alas, life had it otherwise. Hopefully soon. Plus a new Tóxico interview. His thoughts on cinema still swim in our heads.)

Tagged , , , , , , ,

OVERHEARD AT TÓXICO: CHRISTOFFER BOE

(While we wait for Christopher Doyle to arrive in three days, a little fragment out of Christoffer Boe’s Tóxico Workshop.)

**

On cinematic desires

“The internal dynamic of film always start with a hint of desire: something is wanted. Even if it is the faintest wanting, or even if it is the need of a want. Because some of the greatest movies are based on characters that don’t desire anything, but do want to desire something. Or they wanted something once and don’t want it any more.  The presence of a desire is essential to movies, and to each scene, and to a character. It is also the way I work best with actors: in our mutual understanding of the desires that drive each moment. Instead of telling an actor to be funny you tell him: you want to make her laugh, you want her to love you with her laughter. It is a completely different thing, giving concrete wishes to people instead of generic instructions. In this there is also contrasts, and undercurrents. In every scene there is a desire, and a contrast to the desire: something is working against it, underneath it. The movie also wants and desires. The movie wants to portray a beautiful woman. We need a desire for the movie, a desire for the camera, and then we need to invent obstacles for them visually, to keep the need for enigma and the need of discovery playing with one another.”

Tagged , ,

OVERHEARD AT TÓXICO: CHRISTOFFER BOE

On the paradox of uniqueness

“if you think about it, being unique should not  be that difficult. There are 6 billion people on this planet and yet we all look different. But we usually still try to be or seem  like everybody else. It is the same with film. And there is always a battle between the collectiveness of language and a personal point of view. On one hand, I want it so that my film could have not been done by anybody but Herr Boe & Co. On the other hand, I need a  context that can make it live outside just my own worldview. The question is always how to make a personal language collective, or how to make this collective language personalized. It has to be unique but it also has to make sense. You want to find a private language but let people know enough of this language to extract meaning from it.”

(Christoffer Boe–acclaimed Danish film director–gave a fabulous Tóxico Workshop in February 2008.)

Tagged , , , ,